If you’ve ever seen ratings such as “A1” or “B1” on a French reading resource and wondered what it meant, you’re not alone. In fact, many teachers in the United States are far more familiar with ACTFL proficiency levels or state/provincial standards than with the CEFR. Yet, the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) has become the global benchmark for describing language ability, and it offers incredible clarity for us as French teachers.
In this post, I’ll explain what the CEFR is, how it developed, how it compares to ACTFL and state standards, and why it can transform the way you choose and design reading materials.
The CEFR was introduced by the Council of Europe in the 1990s as part of a broader movement to standardize and democratize language learning across Europe. Instead of defining proficiency by seat time (e.g., “two years of French”) or by age/grade level, CEFR descriptors are based on what learners can actually do with the language.
The framework includes six levels, grouped into three bands:
A1 & A2 – Basic User
B1 & B2 – Independent User
C1 & C2 – Proficient User
Each level describes performance across four domains - listening, speaking, reading, and writing. This competency-based approach has since been adopted far beyond Europe, influencing language policy, testing, and curriculum design worldwide.
For many teachers, it’s helpful to map CEFR against ACTFL proficiency guidelines:
A1–A2 ≈ ACTFL Novice (Low–High)
B1–B2 ≈ ACTFL Intermediate (Low–High)
C1–C2 ≈ ACTFL Advanced
State and provincial standards often mirror the same descriptors: reading familiar texts, demonstrating comprehension strategies, recognizing cultural references, and moving toward more independent communication.
This alignment means you can confidently use CEFR as a bridge between global benchmarks and local expectations.
So what does this mean for reading instruction? Here’s how reading typically looks at each CEFR stage:
A1 (Beginner): Students can recognize familiar words, names, numbers, and short phrases in highly supported texts. Comprehension relies on visuals, repetition, and predictable contexts.
A2 (Elementary): Students can understand short paragraphs about everyday life, identify key ideas, and follow simple descriptions. Texts may include expanded vocabulary but remain concrete and familiar.
B1 (Intermediate): Students can read connected sentences across longer passages, follow main ideas, and begin to handle past and future tenses. They can interpret explanations, reasons, and comparisons.
B2 (Upper Intermediate): Students can read with greater independence, interpret detail, and recognize opinion or argument. They can understand cultural references and follow more abstract ideas.
C1/C2 (Advanced): Students can read long, nuanced texts with complex structures, idiomatic language, shifts in style, and multiple perspectives. They move beyond comprehension to analysis, inference, and critical reflection.
If you majored in Language Learning, you may be familiar with Stephen Krashen’s theory of Comprehensible Input. He argued that students progress best when the material they're presented with is just beyond their current level, what he called i+1.
That’s exactly what CEFR helps us do:
If students are securely at A1, they need texts that stretch them into A2.
If they’re reading at B1, we can challenge them with elements of B2.
This framework reassures us that we’re not “watering down” content. Instead, we’re meeting students where they are and nudging them forward.
Not sure where to start? One simple classroom strategy is the Five Finger Rule:
Select a passage (about one page).
As the student reads, raise a finger for each unknown word or breakdown in comprehension.
At the end of the page:
0–1 fingers: Too easy - move up a level.
2–3 fingers: Just right - challenging but manageable.
4–5 fingers: Too hard - step back for now.
This simple test pairs beautifully with Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, one of the most influential theories in second-language acquisition. Krashen argued that learners progress best when they receive comprehensible input, language they mostly understand, with just enough new material to stretch them. He called this the i+1 principle:
i = what the learner already knows
+1 = the next step that pushes their ability forward
If input is too easy (i only), students don’t grow. If it’s too difficult (+10, not +1), they shut down. The sweet spot is right in between - challenging, but still accessible.
That’s exactly what the CEFR levels are designed to provide: a clear roadmap of what the “+1” looks like at each stage. Using CEFR descriptors gives teachers a simple, evidence-based way to make sure students are always in that productive learning zone.
The CEFR’s greatest strength is its clarity. Instead of guessing whether a passage is “too hard” or “too easy,” we can anchor our choices in well-defined levels that have been tested internationally. For teachers, this means:
Differentiation with ease: Offer the same theme (e.g., travel, food, or seasons) at different levels, so every learner can participate.
Confidence in planning: Know that your resources connect not only to your local standards but also to global benchmarks.
A growth pathway: CEFR shows students what comes next, making progress visible and motivating.
You don’t need to memorize every descriptor or become a CEFR specialist overnight. Think of it as a toolbox that helps you scaffold learning and choose appropriate texts.
If you're looking for a place to start, my French Reading Comprehension Packs are intentionally leveled by CEFR so you can focus less on finding the right text and more on teaching.
Ready to try them in your classroom?
Check out my FREE Reading Comprehension Pack here!
Or explore the full collection in my TpT store.
Let me know if you try them! I always love hearing how other teachers use these in creative ways!
À la prochaine!